MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005709852 · doi:10.1139/p01-066

Thermoluminescence recorded in a hyperbolic heating profile

2001· article· en· W2005709852 on OpenAlex
M. Bhattacharya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsThermoluminescenceHyperbolic partial differential equationPlateau (mathematics)Differential equationHyperbolic functionSymmetry (geometry)Mathematical analysisOpticsQuantum mechanicsLuminescenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermoluminescence (TL) glow curves corresponding to a hyperbolic heating profile are computed, for the first time, by solving a system of coupled differential equations using the fourth-order Runge–Kutta method taking into account the presence of thermally disconnected traps. The variations of the peak temperature and the symmetry factor with the change of the fractional-filling ratio have been studied, not only for the TL peaks obtained as a result of the solution of the coupled differential equations but also for TL peaks obeying Randall–Wilkins and Garlick–Gibson equations in a hyperbolic heating program. Finally, the validity of the plateau test has also been considered. PACS No.: 78.60Kn

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it