MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005713837 · doi:10.1139/s07-019

Performance evaluation of fabric aided slow sand filter in drinking water treatment

2007· article· en· W2005713837 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Pulin K. Mondal, Rajesh Seth, Nihar Biswas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbidityRaw waterSlow sand filterFilter (signal processing)Sand filterWater treatmentEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryEnvironmental engineeringRaw materialNonwoven fabricMaterials scienceComposite materialWastewaterGeologyChemistryEngineeringFiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, an assessment of the performance of slow sand filter (SSF) aided with non-woven fabric (NWF) was carried out. Several laboratory-scale SSF columns were tested with simulated raw water containing varying levels of turbidity and total organic carbon (TOC). The results show that in filters with NWF, the fabric layers captured most of the incoming solids and extended the filter run time for the sand bed. The run time for the sand bed increased with the increasing of the fabric thickness from 8.9 to 44.5 mm. Turbidity, TOC, and bacterial removal efficiencies of the filters with fabric were comparable to that without fabric and representing conventional SSF. The study thus demonstrates that operation of SSF with NWF can be a feasible option for simplifying the operation of and extending the viability of the SSF process to a wider range of raw water turbidity values than that considered economical for conventional SSF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207