MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005720493 · doi:10.1093/jis/eti157

Grammarians and Grammatical Theory in the Medieval Arabic Tradition.
 Ramzi Baalbaki (Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate/Variorum, 2004), 354 pp. Price HB £59.50 ISBN 0–860–78948–9

2005· article· en· W2005720493 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tamás Iványi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Islamic Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArabicHierarchyLinguisticsHarmony (color)Order (exchange)Quarter (Canadian coin)Schema (genetic algorithms)PhilosophyHistorySociologyComputer scienceArtLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume contains eighteen articles, arranged by three strictly related topics: papers about Sībawayhi's Kitāb, other grammarians and related disciplines, and finally Arabic grammatical theory. Given that the papers, selected for the Variorum, span nearly a quarter of a century from 1979 to 2001, their great coherence, both methodological and thematic, is striking, so too is their impressively high scholarly standard. Below I will give a brief survey of each paper, in the chronological order of their original publication, rather than the order they appear in the volume. Chapter II: ‘Some Aspects of Harmony and Hierarchy in Sībawayhi's Grammatical Analysis’ (1979) touches on the much-discussed problem as to whether the first Arab grammarian should be characterized as being descriptive or prescriptive in his methods. Among other issues, this article deals with Sībawayhi's overall system of grammatical analysis: ‘the manipulation of linguistic material to discover the major principles according to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Islamic StudiesSame topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207