Understanding Comorbidity of Anxiety Disorders With Antisocial Behavior
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although a positive association between antisocial behavior and anxiety disorders may seem clinically counterintuitive, some previous studies have in fact found a higher co-occurrence of anxiety disorders and antisocial behavior than in the general population. We investigated the relationship between anxiety disorders and antisocial behavior in two contemporaneous community surveys (National Comorbidity Survey, Ontario Health Survey). A significant association was found between any DSM-III-R anxiety disorder diagnosis and any DSM-III-R antisocial diagnosis (National Comorbidity Survey, odds ratio = 3.05, p <.01; Ontario Health Survey, odds ratio = 2.37, p <.01). This association remained significant after controlling for sociodemographics, depression, and alcohol and drug use disorders. Posttraumatic stress disorder and social phobia complex subtype (i.e., multiple social fears) produced the largest odds ratios. People with comorbid anxiety and antisocial diagnoses displayed high levels of distress, neuroticism, and disability, and poor quality of life. Clinicians and health policy makers need to be aware of the co-occurrence of anxiety disorders and antisocial behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it