Influence of phytohormones on morphology and chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters in embryos of Fucus vesiculosus L. (Phaeophyceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While a variety of plant hormones from brown algae were described, there were few studies that examined the combined effects of these hormones on morphogenesis and photosynthetic physiology in developing fucoid embryos. We evaluated the effects of phytohormones to determine the extent, to which responses were similar to those of terrestrial plants. Kinetin, IAA, ABA, GA3, and kinetin + IAA were added to seawater at a physiological concentration (1 mg/L), and embryos of Fucus vesiculosus L. were grown for 10 days. Photosynthetic activity of single embryos or embryo cells were characterized using the following fluorescence parameters: minimum fluorescence yield (F 0), maximum quantum yield (F v/F m), relative maximum rate of electron transfer to photosystem II under saturation irradiances (rETRmax), photosynthetic efficiency under non-saturating irradiances (αETR) and saturation irradiance (E k). In addition, embryo length and diameter and apical hair length and number were determined. Morphological changes associated with hormone treatments included an increase in the embryo length in the presence of IAA, an increase in the embryo diameter in the presence of IAA, kinetin, and kinetin + IAA, an increase in the maximum hair length and number in the presence of kinetin + IAA, and a decrease in the hair length and number in the presence of ABA. With respect to fluorescence parameters, significant effects of phytohormones included an increase in the F 0 and F v/F m at kinetin treatment, a synergistic effect of kinetin + IAA on F v/F m, rETRmax, and αETR, a promotion of F v/F m by GA, and a decrease of the parameters by ABA. These results are consistent with the data on responses of land plants to the same hormones and suggest that brown algae have evolved regulatory mechanisms for morphogenesis and photosynthetic regulation similar to plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".