MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Partial discrete Fourier transform (PDFT) multiband encoding

2001· article· en· W2005743045 on OpenAlexafffund
Charles H. Cunningham, Jeffrey A. Stainsby, Graham A. Wright, Michael L. Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences Centre
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEncoding (memory)Hadamard transformAlgorithmDiscrete Fourier transform (general)Fourier transformComputer sciencePhase (matter)Sensitivity (control systems)Fast Fourier transformFourier analysisPhysicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceFractional Fourier transformMathematical analysisElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For conventional multiband encoding techniques such as Hadamard encoding, scan time scales linearly with the number of slices encoded simultaneously. In this work, a new multiband encoding technique called partial discrete Fourier transform (PDFT) encoding is introduced, which overcomes this restriction. This technique incorporates the principle of partial Fourier imaging, allowing the tradeoff of SNR and imaging time without changing the number of slices. The theory behind PDFT encoding and its inherent sensitivity to phase errors are outlined. The theory was validated through simulations, showing that phase errors result in degraded slice localization. The feasibility of PDFT encoding of 12 slices was tested with experimental excitation profile measurements and heart images of a human subject using commercial MRI equipment. Imaging time was reduced to 66% with SNR reduced to 82%. Magn Reson Med 45:118-127, 2001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207