Use of orthoses lowers the O2 cost of walking in children with spastic cerebral palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of hinged ankle foot orthoses (AFO) on the metabolic and cardiopulmonary cost of walking and gross motor skills of children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Ten habitual users of hinged AFO with spastic diplegic CP (9.01 yr +/- 2.10) participated in the study. Expired gas and heart rate (HR) were measured during sitting and with AFO on and off during steady state treadmill walking at three speeds: 3 km.h(-1), comfortable walking speed (CWS), and 90% of their fastest walking speed (FWS). Comfortable and fastest ground walking speed and Gross Motor Function Measure scores were also assessed with AFO on and off and analyzed with ANOVA. Because not all children could walk at all speeds on the treadmill, an ANOVA was performed on data for children who walked at 3 km.h(-1) and CWS (N = 8 for HR; N = 9 for pulmonary ventilation and metabolic variables) and a t-test on data at 90% of FWS (N = 9 for HR; N = 8 for pulmonary ventilation and metabolic variables). RESULTS: When children wore their AFO net oxygen uptake (L.min(-1), absolute--sitting values) was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by 8.9% at 3 km.h(-1) and by 5.9% at 90% of FWS. Net pulmonary ventilation (L.min(-1)) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower with AFO on by 10.3% but only at 3 km.h(-1). AFO did not affect net HR (beats.min(-1)) nor the respiratory exchange ratio at any speed, nor any physiologic variable at CWS, nor gross motor skills. CONCLUSIONS: Use of hinged AFO reduces the oxygen and ventilatory cost of walking in children with spastic diplegic CP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".