Evidence for Unfolding of the Single-Stranded GCCA 3‘-End of a tRNA on Its Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase from a Stacked Helical to a Foldback Conformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conformation of a tRNA in its initial contact with its cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase was investigated with the Escherichia coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Glu) complex. Covalent complexes between the periodate-oxidized tRNA(Glu) and its synthetase were obtained. These complexes are specific since none were formed with any other oxidized E. coli tRNA. The three major residues cross-linked to the 3'-terminal adenosine of oxidized tRNA(Glu) are Lys115, Arg209, and Arg48. Modeling of the tRNA(Glu)-glutamyl-tRNA synthetase based on the known crystal structures of Thermus thermophilus GluRS and of the E. coli tRNA(Gln)-glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase complex shows that these three residues are located in the pocket that binds the acceptor stem, and that Lys115, located in a 26 residue loop closed by coordination to a zinc atom in the tRNA acceptor stem-binding domain, is the first contact point of the 3'-terminal adenosine of tRNA(Glu). In our model, we assume that the 3'-terminal GCCA single-stranded segment of tRNA(Glu) is helical and extends the stacking of the acceptor stem. This assumption is supported by the fact that the 3' CCA sequence of tRNA(Glu) is not readily circularized in the presence of T4 RNA ligase under conditions where several other tRNAs are circularized. The two other cross-linked sites are interpreted as the contact sites of the 3'-terminal ribose on the enzyme during the unfolding and movement of the 3'-terminal GCCA segment to position the acceptor ribose in the catalytic site for aminoacylation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".