On the measurement of fracture toughness of soft biogel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the rate dependent energy dissipation process and the fracture toughness of physical gels were investigated using agarose as a sample material. Both the J ‐integral and Essential work of Fracture (EWF) methods were examined. To assess the quasi‐static fracture toughness of gels, linear regression was performed on critical J ( J c ) values at different loading rates resulting in a quasi‐static J c value of 6.5 J/m 2 . This is close to the quasi‐static EWF value of 5.3 J/m 2 obtained by performing EWF tests at a quasi‐static loading rate (crosshead speed of less than 2 mm/min). Nearly constant crack propagation rates at low loading rates, regardless of crack length, suggest viscoplastic chain pull‐out is the fracture mechanism. At high loading rates failure was highly brittle, which is attributed to sufficient elastic energy accumulation to precipitate failure by chain scission. We conclude that in physical gels quasi‐static fracture toughness can be evaluated by both the J ‐integral and EWF methods provided the effects of loading rate are investigated and accounted for. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it