MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2005799185 · doi:10.1139/w02-021

Enzymes of malate metabolism in<i>Mesorhizobium ciceri</i>CC 1192

2002· article· en· W2005799185 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Catherine A. Tabrett, Les Copeland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsMalate dehydrogenaseNAD+ kinaseMalic enzymeBiochemistryEnzymeDehydrogenaseMetabolismBiologyCofactorChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrophoretic studies were performed on enzymes concerned with the oxidation of malate in free-living and bacteroid cells of Mesorhizobium ciceri CC 1192, which forms nitrogen-fixing symbioses with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants. Two malate dehydrogenases were detected in extracts from both types of cells in native polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels that were stained for enzyme activity. One band of malate dehydrogenase activity was stained only in the presence of NADP+, whereas the other band was revealed with NAD+ but not NADP+. Further evidence for the occurrence of separate NAD- and NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenases was obtained from preliminary enzyme kinetic studies with crude extracts from free-living M. ciceri CC 1192 cells. Activity staining of electrophoretic gels also indicated the presence of two malic enzymes in free-living and bacteroid cells of M. ciceri CC 1192. One malic enzyme was active with both NAD+ and NADP+, whereas the other was specific for NADP+. Possible roles of the multiple forms of malate dehydrogenase and malic enzyme in nitrogen-fixing symbioses are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis→French-language works237,207→