Vortex-Induced Vibrations of a Flexible Cylinder in a Slowly Varying Flow: Experimental Results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with a wind tunnel simulation of the vortex-induced vibrations of a long flexible cylinder in cross-flow when the flow velocity varies periodically with different low frequencies and different flow velocity amplitude. The experimental set-up consists of a flexible tube suspended at the nodes of its first free-free mode of vibration. In order to modulate the wind velocity, the fan rpm of the wind tunnel is controlled: this simulation allows the excursions and incursions in the region of lock-in as well as the periodical crossing of the critical curve separating the 2S and 2P modes of vortex shedding. The additional objective of the simulation is to reproduce more closely the behavior of aerial conductor in the fields and exposed to large scale and low frequency “turbulence”. The results show that the amplitude of vibrations of the flexible tube is modulated with the frequency of the periodic wind fluctuations: it can range from a simple beating to chaotic fluctuations superimposed to a mean. The amplitude of vibrations, when compared to the case of steady wind velocity, may decrease or increase according to the range of the wind mean velocity. Modulation taking different shapes is observed: it may adopt a wave form made of “sharp” peaks or “smooth” periodic oscillations or a combination of the two; sometimes it may be of chaotic form. A link is established between the “sharp” peaks, the occurrence of bifurcations, the presence of the two modes of vortex shedding and the critical curve. The instantaneous amplitude of vibrations is observed to exceed that measured under steady flow conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".