MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005806619 · doi:10.12789/geocanj.2014.41.058

Logan Medallist 1. Seeking the Suture: The Coast-Cascade Conundrum

2014· article· en· W2005806619 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jim W.H. Monger

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerraneGeologySubductionCretaceousFibrous jointPaleomagnetismPaleontologyNorth American PlateTectonicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The boundary between rocks assigned to the Intermontane superterrane in the interior of the Canadian Cordillera and those of the Insular superterrane in the westernmost Cordillera of British Columbia and southeastern Alaska lies within/along the Coast Mountains, in which is exposed the core of an orogen that emerged as a discrete tectonic entity between 105 and 45 million years ago. Evidence from the Coast Mountains and flanking areas indicates that parts of the Intermontane superterrane (in Stikinia and Yukon-Tanana terranes) were near those of the Insular superterrane (Wrangellia and Alexander terranes) by the Early Jurassic (~180 Ma). This timing, as well as paleobiogeographic and paleomagnetic considerations, appears to discount a recent hypothesis that proposes westward-dipping subduction beneath an intra-oceanic arc on Insular superterrane resulted in arc-continent collision and inaugurated Cordilleran orogenesis in the Late Jurassic (~146 Ma). The hypothesis also relates the subducted ocean that had separated the superterranes to a massive, faster-than-average-velocity seismic anomaly in the lower mantle below the eastern seaboard of North America. To create such an anomaly, subduction of the floor of a large ocean was needed. The only surface record of such an ocean in the interior of the Canadian Cordillera is the Cache Creek terrane, which lies within the Intermontane superterrane but is no younger than Middle Jurassic (~174 Ma). This terrane, together with the probably related Bridge River terrane in the southeastern Coast Mountains, which is as young as latest Middle Jurassic (164 Ma) and possibly as young as earliest Cretaceous (≥ 130 Ma), appear to be the only candidates in Canada for the possible surface record of the seismic anomaly. SOMMAIRELa limite entre les roches assignées au Superterrane d’intermont de l’intérieur des Cordillères canadiennes et celles du Superterrane insulaire dans la portion la plus à l’ouest de la Cordillère de Colombie-Britannique et du sud-est de l’Alaska se trouvent dans et au long de la Chaîne côtière, au sein de laquelle affleure le noyau d’un orogène qui est apparu comme entité tectonique distincte entre 105 et 45 millions d’années. Des indices de la Chaîne côtière et des régions environnantes montrent que des portions du Superterrane d’intermont (dans les terranes de Stikinia et de Yukon-Tanana) se trouvaient alors près de celles du Superterrane insulaire (terranes de Wrangellia et d’Alexander) au début du Jurassique (~180 Ma). Cette chronologie, ajoutée à certains facteurs paléobiogéographiques et paléomagnétiques semblent discréditer une hypothèse récente voulant qu’une subduction à pendage ouest sous un arc intra-océanique sur le Superterrane insulaire résultait d’une collision entre un arc et le continent, initiant ainsi l’orogénèse de la Cordillère à la fin du Jurassique (~146 Ma). Cette hypothèse relie aussi l’océan subduit qui séparait les superterranes à une anomalie de vitesse sismique plus rapide que la normale dans le manteau inférieur sous le littoral maritime oriental de l’Amérique du Nord. Pour créer une telle anomalie, la subduction du plancher d’un grand océan était nécessaire. La seule indication de surface de l’existence d’un tel océan à l’intérieur de la Cordillère canadienne est le terrane de Cache Creek qui, bien qu’il se trouve dans le Superterrane d’intermont, est plus ancien que le Jurassique moyen (~174 Ma). Ce terrane, avec son équivalent probable de Bridge River dans le sud-est de la Chaîne côtière, qui est aussi jeune que la fin du Jurassique (164 Ma) et peut-être aussi jeune que le début du Crétacé (≥ 130 Ma), semblent être les seuls candidats au Canada offrant des vestiges en surface de cette anomalie sismique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1610.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207