MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005838608 · doi:10.5216/rpp.v13i3.10946

MOTIVAÇÃO PARA A PRÁTICA DE ATIVIDADES FÍSICAS DE PESSOAS AMPUTADAS

2010· article· pt· W2005838608 on OpenAlexaff
Simone Teresinha Meurer, Luciana Erina Palma

Bibliographic record

VenuePensar a Prática · 2010
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente estudo objetivou compreender aspectos da motivação de pessoas amputadas. Participaram quatro pessoas amputadas, sendo duas praticantes de atividades físicas e duas não praticantes. Os resultados mostraram que estes apresentaram motivação elevada para a prática de atividades físicas, porém, comportamentos diferenciados. Com auxilio da Teoria da Autodeterminação, compreendeu-se a importância da satisfação das necessidades psicológicas básicas para o desenvolvimento da motivação autodeterminada, essencial para estas pessoas superarem as possíveis barreiras atitudinais e se inserirem e manterem na prática de atividades físicas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePensar a PráticaSame topicMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsFrench-language works237,207