MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005848647 · doi:10.7202/1016689ar

La construction discursive de l’identité francophone en Acadie ou « comment être francophone à partir des marges » ?

2013· article· fr· W2005848647 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Laurence Arrighi, Annette Boudreau

Bibliographic record

VenueMinorités linguistiques et société · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article met l’accent sur l’apport des discours « d’autorité » dans la construction de l’idéologie du français unique, très présent dans la francophonie. Émanant des « centres » linguistiques et souvent considérés comme référence et source légitime du savoir, ces discours « savants » jouent un rôle fondamental dans la construction des représentations et idéologies linguistiques, notamment dans les milieux minoritaires, où l’examen théorique et épistémologique des « objets » minoritaires est souvent négligé au profit d’études plus empiriques. L’article interroge notamment le rôle que joue le linguiste en milieu minoritaire étant donné que ce dernier contribue parfois, à son insu, à stéréotyper certaines pratiques des francophones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinorités linguistiques et sociétéSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207