MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Premaxillary Augmentation: Adjunct to Rhinoplasty

2000· article· en· W2005862686 on OpenAlexaff
Nabil Fanous, Adi Yoskovitch

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjunctRhinoplastyMedicineSurgeryNosePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recession of the premaxillary area is a relatively common deformity. Typically, it presents as a mild weakness of the central maxilla, but in certain instances, such as in the Black and Asian communities, it may be moderate to severe. This condition can be compounded by a narrow nasolabial angle, recessed alar bases, and sunken cheeks. To resolve this deficiency, a new design for premaxillary augmentation is suggested. A bat-shaped premaxillary implant is used for correction. The implant is introduced by means of an intranasal or intraoral approach, while the patient is under either local or general anesthesia. Thirty-three patients have been managed for premaxillary recession and have been corrected by premaxillary augmentation. Satisfactory cosmetic results have been achieved, with only a few minor complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesFrench-language works237,207