MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005889976 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277549

Combination of Coarse Symbol Timing and Carrier Frequency Offset (CFO) Estimation Techniques for MIMO OFDM Systems

2006· article· en· W2005889976 on OpenAlexaff
Chen‐Yu Huang, W.J. Misskey, Joe Toth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarrier frequency offsetCyclic prefixOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceEstimatorRobustness (evolution)Frequency offsetMultipath propagationAlgorithmMIMOElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel and accurate combination of data-aided techniques for simultaneous maximum likelihood (ML) coarse symbol timing and carrier frequency offset (CFO) estimation of multi-input multi-output (MIMO) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) outdoor systems constructed by DVB-T subsystems. The embedded continual pilot tones in DVB-T are utilized to perform the coarse timing recovery with low system complexity. The inherent cyclic prefix (CP) of the DVB-T symbol is used for CFO estimation. By means of simulations, the proposed coarse timing method shows excellent robustness even at a very low SNR for the continuous transmission mode, and is also suitable for burst mode. In addition, the performance of the designed CFO estimator is close to the Cramer-Rao lower bound, increases for increasing delay of multipath spread and the number of receive antennas, and also performs as expected with timing estimation errors, which all agree well with the theoretical results

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207