Clinical significance of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in patients with varying degree of coronary artery stenosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify myocardial perfusion abnormalities in a cohort of patients having coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors, with either suspected or clinical evidence of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and with varying degree of coronary artery stenosis. (2) To evaluate the clinical significance of the extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities assessed by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in relation to the anatomical location of coronary stenosis demonstrated by five-vessel selective coronary angiography (SCA). METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients (106 male, 32 female) with suspected or clinical evidence of IHD underwent diagnostic evaluation at the Central Hospital of Nicosia, between November 2002 and August 2003. The diagnostic work-up included clinical examination, exercise tolerance test, SCA and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) using either Tl chloride or Tc-tetrofosmin. RESULTS: Based on the results of SCA, patients were divided into five groups on the basis of stenosis as cross-sectional area of coronary artery lumen and its haemodynamic significance, ranging from group 1=less than 50% coronary stenosis to group 5=100% stenosis (occlusion). Nine of 11 (40.9%) patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries (group 1) had moderate inducible reversible ischaemia on MPS and 9/47 (19.1%) patients with insignificant coronary stenosis (less than 75% stenosis=group 2) had fixed perfusion defects, compatible with previous myocardial infarction. The extent of perfusion abnormalities in post-stress MPS patients from group 2 was not found to be statistically significant (P>0.05) when compared to patients belonging to groups 3, 4 and 5. However, the extent of perfusion abnormalities between patients from group 2, when compared to groups 3, 4 and 5 demonstrated significant statistical difference (P<0.05) on post-rest MPS studies. Furthermore, there was no significant statistical correlation between anatomical location of coronary stenosis and severity of perfusion abnormalities in the corresponding myocardial segments. CONCLUSION: Patients with CAD risk factors, and coronary arteries with insignificant stenosis on angiography, may demonstrate inducible reversible myocardial ischaemia. This is suggestive of coronary endothelial dysfunction. Patients with insignificant coronary artery stenosis and no previous history of adverse coronary events may demonstrate features of previous myocardial infarction on MPS. The severity of perfusion defects demonstrated by MPS may be independent of the anatomical location of coronary artery stenosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".