MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005911158 · doi:10.1124/mi.11.1.5

NOX Isoforms and Reactive Oxygen Species in Vascular Health

2011· review· en· W2005911158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Interventions · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsNADPH oxidaseReactive oxygen speciesCell biologyGene isoformSubcellular localizationSignal transductionBiologyChemistryBiochemistryCytoplasmGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important mediators of cell growth, adhesion, differentiation, migration, senescence, and apoptosis. ROS play an important physiological role in regulating vascular tone and can also contribute to pathological mechanisms related to endothelial dysfunction, vascular reactivity, arterial remodeling, and vascular inflammation. The major source of ROS generated in the cardiovascular system is the NADPH oxidase (NOX) family of enzymes, of which seven members have been characterized. Although each NOX family member is typified by six transmembrane domains along with a cytoplasmic domain that binds NADPH and FAD, each isoform is distinguished by the specific catalytic subunit, interacting proteins, and subcellular localization. We review the current understanding of NOX signaling and regulatory mechanisms related to vascular health and disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it