A Covalent Inhibitor Targeting an Intermediate Conformation of the Fusogenic Subunit of the HIV-1 Envelope Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptide inhibitors corresponding to sequences in the six helix bundle structure of the fusogenic portion (gp41) of the HIV envelope glycoprotein have been successfully implemented in preventing HIV entry. These peptides bind to regions in HIV gp41 transiently exposed during the fusion reaction. In an effort to improve upon these entry inhibitors, we have successfully designed and tested peptide analogs composed of chemical spacers and reactive moieties positioned strategically to facilitate covalent attachment. Using a temperature-arrested state prime wash in vitro assay we show evidence for the trapping of a pre-six helix bundle fusion intermediate by a covalent reaction with the specific anti-HIV-1 peptide. This is the first demonstration of the trapping of an intermediate conformation of a viral envelope glycoprotein during the fusion process that occurs in live cells. The permanent specific attachment of the covalent inhibitor is projected to improve the pharmacokinetics of administration in vivo and thereby improve the long-term sustainability of peptide entry inhibitor therapy and help to expand its applicability beyond salvage therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".