MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006011947 · doi:10.1109/cimsa.2011.6059913

Classification of gear damage levels in planetary gearboxes

2011· article· en· W2006011947 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiliang Liu, Ming J. Zuo, Jian Qu, Hongbing Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear discriminant analysisDiscriminantArtificial intelligenceFeature extractionFeature selectionComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Support vector machineSelection (genetic algorithm)Baseline (sea)Machine learningGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is a method of feature extraction that has demonstrated successful applications. The selection of the number of discriminant directions (r) is important to LDA, yet little attention is paid in the reported literature. In this paper a method is proposed for determining the optimal r in terms of the classification accuracy of support vector machine. The method is applied to identify gear damage levels in a planetary gearbox. Planet gears with four damage levels labeled as baseline, slight, moderate, and severe were used in lab experiments for data collection. Results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms two reported methods and is effective to address the given problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207