MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Elimination of false-negative hepatitis C virus RNA results by removal of inhibitors in cadaver-organ donor blood specimens

2003· article· en· W2006032136 on OpenAlexaff
David Padley, Sebastian Lucas, J. Saldanha

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverse transcriptaseNucleic acidHepatitis C virusRNAVirologyPolymerase chain reactionVirusDNAReverse transcription polymerase chain reactionRNA extractionMolecular biologyAntibodyReal-time polymerase chain reactionBiologyMessenger RNAGeneImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detection of viral nucleic acids in blood samples from cadavers is often difficult because of inhibition of the reverse transcriptase (RT) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) steps by substances present in the samples. A robust method for the extraction and detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA from cadaver blood samples by polymerase chain reaction RT-PCR has been developed on the basis of the Qiagen QIAamp DNA mini kit extraction system (Basel, Switzerland). Twenty of 36 samples tested were positive for HCV RNA. Six of the 16 HCV-antibody- and RNA-negative samples contained inhibitors that were successfully removed by pretreatment of samples with the Qiagen AX matrix before extraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207