MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006047280 · doi:10.1243/0954410011531709

A flight control design of a re-entry vehicle using a double-loop control system with fuzzy gain-scheduling

2001· article· en· W2006047280 on OpenAlexaff
A. Fujimori, P.N. Nikiforuk, Μ.Μ. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGain schedulingControl theory (sociology)Inner loopFuzzy control systemControl systemTrajectoryLoop (graph theory)Fuzzy logicControl engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Controller (irrigation)Artificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a flight control design of an Automatic Landing FLight EXperiment (ALFLEX) vehicle using a double-loop control system (DLCS) with the fuzzy gain-scheduling (FGS) state feedback. The DLCS consists of an inner and an outer loop. The inner-loop control law is designed by the FGS state feedback to guarantee the stability over the entire operating range of the ALFLEX vehicle, while the outer loop control law is designed by a static gain to improve the tracking property. Futhermore, guidance laws for the longitudinal and the lateral directions are included in the control system to navigate the ALFLEX vehicle to a reference trajectory even if the initial condition is deviated from the nominal. The designed DLCS showed satisfactory performance in the numerical simulation of the ALFLEX vehicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace EngineeringSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207