MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006066203 · doi:10.1063/1.4766305

Intrinsic localized modes in two-dimensional vibrations of crystalline pillars and their application for sensing

2012· article· en· W2006066203 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel A. Brake, Huiwen Xu, Andrew E Hollowell, Ganesh Balakrishnan, Chris Hains, Mario C. Marconi, Vakhtang Putkaradze

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFabricationVibrationPillarMaterials scienceMolecular vibrationOrientation (vector space)NanotechnologyNano-PhysicsOpticsAcousticsGeometryRaman spectroscopyMechanical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a complete analysis on the possibility of exciting and observing the intrinsic localized modes (ILMs) in a crystalline linear array of nano pillars. We discuss the nano-fabrication techniques for these arrays and visualization procedures to observe the real-time dynamics. As a consequence, we extend previous models to the study of two dimensional vibrations to be consistent with these restrictions. For these pillars, the elastic properties and hence the dynamics depend on the pillar's shape and the orientation of the crystal axes. We show that ILMs do form in the system, but their stability, defect pinning, and reaction to friction strongly depend on the crystals properties, with the optimal dynamics only achieved in a rather small region of the parameter space. We also demonstrate fabrication techniques for these pillars and discuss the applications of these pillar arrays to sensing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207