MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006090945 · doi:10.1097/yct.0b013e3181e63302

Stimulus Pulse-Frequency-Dependent Efficacy and Cognitive Adverse Effects of Ultrabrief-Pulse Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Major Depression

2010· article· en· W2006090945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ect · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroconvulsive therapyStimulus (psychology)CognitionDepression (economics)MedicinePsychologyPulse (music)AnesthesiaPsychiatryPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: : Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective treatment for major depression. New ECT devices with shorter pulse widths seem to induce seizures more effectively at a lower seizure threshold and with fewer cognitive adverse effects. Suprathreshold right unilateral (RUL) ultrabrief-pulse ECT with pulse widths between 0.25 and 0.30 millisecond seem to be especially effective with regard to efficacy and cognitive adverse effects. A lower pulse frequency (50 pulses per second) in RUL ECT was found to be more efficient than a higher pulse frequency (200 pulses per second) in inducing seizures. However, effective stimulus dose can often be achieved only with high stimulus frequency, whereas the impact of increased stimulus frequency on antidepressant efficacy and cognitive adverse effects is not known. METHODS: : Forty patients with major depression according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition were randomly assigned to 2 groups of 20 patients each and stimulated with either 40 or 100 Hz with equal initial stimulus doses in 9 sessions of suprathreshold RUL ultrabrief-pulse ECT. Depressive symptoms and measures of verbal and working memory were assessed for both groups. RESULTS: : Patients in the 40-Hz condition showed significantly more improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores compared with patients in the 100-Hz condition after 9 ECT sessions. Frequency group had no significant impact on measures of verbal and working memory. CONCLUSIONS: : Within the discussed limitations, our preliminary data suggest an advantage for administering stimulus dose in suprathreshold RUL ultrabrief-pulse ECT with a lower stimulus frequency (40 Hz) as compared with a higher frequency (100 Hz). Further studies are needed to assess whether increasing pulse widths or frequency is the better option for augmenting stimulus dose once other stimulus parameters are at a maximum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it