MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006099459 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/13/14/312

Experimental studies of Coulomb drag between ballistic quantum wires

2001· article· en· W2006099459 on OpenAlexafffund
P. Debray, V. N. Zverev, O. É. Raichev, Rochus Klesse, P. Vasilopoulos, R. S. Newrock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDragCondensed matter physicsPhysicsCoulombCoulomb blockadeQuantumElectronVoltagePosition (finance)Luttinger liquidQuantum mechanicsMechanicsTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Coulomb drag between two spatially separated one-dimensional (1D) electron systems in lithographically fabricated 2 µm long quantum wires is studied experimentally. The drag voltage V D shows peaks as a function of a gate voltage which shifts the position of the Fermi level relative to the 1D subbands. The maximum in V D and the drag resistance R D occurs when the 1D subbands of the wires are aligned and the Fermi wave vector is small. The drag resistance is found to decrease exponentially with interwire separation. In the temperature region 0.2 K⩽T⩽1 K, R D decreases with increasing temperature in a power-law fashion R D ∝ T x with x ranging from -0.6 to -0.77 depending on the gate voltage. We interpret our data in terms of the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207