Bone remodeling in a new biomimetic polymer‐composite hip stem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adaptive bone remodeling is an important factor that leads to bone resorption in the surrounding femoral bone and implant loosening. Taking into account this factor in the design of hip implants is of clinical importance, because it allows the prediction of the bone-density redistribution and enables the monitoring of bone adaptation after prosthetic implantation. In this article, adaptive bone remodeling around a new biomimetic polymer-composite-based (CF/PA12) hip prosthesis is investigated to evaluate the amount of stress shielding and bone resorption. The design concept of this new prosthesis is based on a hollow substructure made of hydroxyapatite-coated, continuous carbon fiber (CF)-reinforced polyamide 12 (PA12) composite with an internal soft polymer-based core. Strain energy density theory coupled with 3D Finite Element models is used to predict bone density redistributions in the femoral bone before and after total hip replacement (THR) using both polymer-composite and titanium (Ti) stems. The result of numerical simulations of bone remodeling revealed that the CF/PA12 composite stem generates a better bone density pattern compared with the Ti-based stem, indicating the effectiveness of the composite stem to reduce bone resorption caused by stress-shielding phenomenon. This may result in an extended lifetime of THR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it