MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006118300 · doi:10.7567/jjap.52.07hc10

Interval of Observation Plane in Visualization of Region near Defects in Billets Using Ultrasonic Computerized Tomography Method

2013· article· en· W2006118300 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Koichi Kakuma, Yoko Norose, Koichi Mizutani, Naoto Wakatsuki

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKempe FoundationHealth Research Board
KeywordsVisualizationUltrasonic sensorPlane (geometry)Materials scienceAcousticsTomographyOpticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeometryPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed defect detection simulation considering billets with a deep-hole or spherical defect. We conducted defect detection in a billet of duralumin with a deep-hole defect and found no discrepancy between our previous and present research results because the images obtained are similar. We also conducted defect detection in a billet of steel with a spherical defect. We obtained visualization images in multiple measurement planes. We also obtained three-dimensional visualization images by binarizing the pseudo sound velocity. From the images, we found that the three-dimensional visualization of spherical defects is possible and that the scanning pitch in the longitudinal direction is about 10 mm at maximum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207