MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006184944 · doi:10.1139/t05-018

Physical clogging of soil filters under constant flow rate versus constant head

2005· article· en· W2006184944 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lakshmi N. Reddi, Ming Xiao, Malay Ghose Hajra, In Mo Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Science and Engineering FoundationUniversity of KansasNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCloggingConstant (computer programming)Permeability (electromagnetism)Geotechnical engineeringHydraulic headVolumetric flow rateMechanicsFiltration (mathematics)Head (geology)Time constantMaterials scienceGeologyMathematicsChemistryEngineeringMembranePhysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the differences in soil filter clogging are evaluated under two operating conditions: constant head and constant flow rate. Whereas filters placed around well screens and leachate collection systems are subjected to a constant flow rate, filters in earth dams and pavement drainage systems operate under constant or slightly varying heads. In this study, the experiments revealed similar permeability reductions with respect to time in both cases; however, the permeability reduction under the condition of constant head occurred in much fewer pore volumes than under the condition of constant flow rate. Self-filtration appeared to be greater under the condition of constant head. The physical clogging model developed for the conditions of constant flow rate and constant head showed good qualitative agreement with experimental observations.Key words: particle, clogging, filter, constant, head, flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207