MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006210034 · doi:10.2174/1389201043376931

Analyzing for Co-Localization of Proteins at a Cell Membrane

2004· review· en· W2006210034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologySignal transductionReceptorCell surface receptorCell signalingBiologyExtracellularCytoplasmCellCell membraneIntracellularTransmembrane proteinChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell-to-cell communication is mediated by molecular interactions at the surface of the cell by soluble ligands released from distant cells or by cell surface molecules on adjacent cells. These interactions lead to activation of intracellular signaling pathways that subsequently can lead to activation of specific genes. This signal transduction process controls cellular activities as diverse as proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, so we must understand the underlying molecular events in detail in order to understand broader questions related to development, uncontrolled growth in tumors, tissue regeneration and use of stem cells to name a few. Binding of a ligand in the extracellular space to a transmembrane receptor constitutes the first crucial step for activation of a signaling pathway within the cell. This binding can either lead to oligomerization of individual receptors, to reorganization of existing clusters of receptors or to changes in the protein conformations, which in turn results in recruitment of signaling molecules in the cytoplasm. While different membrane receptors activate different downstream signaling pathways, some receptors can activate more than one pathway and a particular pathway can be activated by different receptors. It appears that these processes are regulated either by agonists and antagonists in the extracellular medium, by receptor-receptor interactions in the membrane or by a number of signaling mediators in the cytoplasm of the cell. Our work has focused on understanding how the intermolecular interactions in the membrane can control the signal transduction process: Are there specialized structures on the surface that facilitate receptor-receptor interactions? Do the receptors exist as monomers or pre-existing complexes that enhance the probability of activation? Do different receptors associate in the same domains or are there distinct organizational principles for each receptor type. In order to address these questions, we seek to develop tools that allow us to examine intermolecular interactions and reactions directly on the cell surface, particularly on live cells in culture or in tissue. This review discusses some of the approaches that are currently available and highlights some of the key advantages and disadvantages they represent with particular focus on image cross correlation spectroscopy as a relatively new quantitative tool developed by us to address some of these issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it