MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006232821 · doi:10.1039/b707890k

Kinetic analysis of the ozone processing of an unsaturated organic monolayer as a model of an aerosol surface

2007· article· en· W2006232821 on OpenAlexafffund
Erick González-Labrada, Rolf Schmidt, Christine DeWolf

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsOzoneOzonolysisChemistryMonolayerAerosolSurface tensionOleic acidDrop (telecommunication)Surface pressureOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been suggested that an organic aerosol containing unsaturated organic compounds at the surface would likely be processed by atmospheric ozone. The ozonolysis of oleic acid gives rise to the formation of products having shorter chain lengths than the starting molecule, and are consequently more water soluble than oleic acid. Hence, the exposure of a monolayer of oleic acid to ozone should lead to a decrease in surface activity at the air-water interface. A model system is used for real-time measurements of surface tension changes due to ozone exposure of a pendant drop that is coated by a fatty acid monolayer. The surface tension is measured based on an analysis of the shape profile of acquired images of the drop. A study of the kinetics of the gas-surface reaction is presented. Assuming that the uptake of ozone is dominated by the reaction at the surface, the measured reactive uptake coefficient of ozone gamma(meas) is estimated to be (2.6 +/- 0.1) x 10(-6).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207