Comparison of the Changes in Central Catecholamine Systems following Short- and Long-Term Lithium Treatment and the Consequences of Lithium Withdrawal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of treatment with and withdrawal from lithium (Li, 2 mmol/kg) on central catecholamine systems in rat brain were investigated. Synthetic parameters were found to be unchanged after treatment, but abrupt withdrawal resulted in enhanced activity of tyrosine hydroxylase. Noradrenaline levels in most brain regions examined were depressed following both short- and long-term Li administration, with a further decrease in content in the pons but enhanced cortical levels on withdrawal. Li administration resulted in elevated 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid levels, whereas withdrawal caused an enhancement of homovanillic acid content and depression of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl glycol levels. It appears that the changes in central catecholamine systems are qualitatively the same following both short- and long-term Li treatment, as are the consequences of abrupt Li withdrawal. It is suggested that Li administration results in a disruption of catecholamine storage processes, while withdrawal from Li does not result in a simple return towards normal states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".