MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006261739 · doi:10.1021/ja039396f

A Succession of Isomers of Ruthenium Dihydride Complexes. Which One Is the Ketone Hydrogenation Catalyst?

2005· article· en· W2006261739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetophenoneChemistryDiamineEthylenediamineRutheniumMedicinal chemistryCatalysisKetoneAmine gas treatingStereochemistryTransaminationOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reaction of RuHCl(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (1a, diamine = (R,R)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane, (R,R)-dach; 1b, diamine = ethylenediamine, en) with KO(t)Bu in benzene quickly generates solutions of the amido-amine complexes RuH(PPh(3))(2)(NHC(6)H(10)NH(2)), (2a'), and RuH(PPh(3))(2)(NHCH(2)CH(2)NH(2)), (2b'), respectively. These solutions react with dihydrogen to first produce the trans-dihydrides (OC-6-22)-Ru(H)(2)(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (t,c-3a, t,c-3b). Cold solutions (-20 degrees C) containing trans-dihydride t,c-3a react with acetophenone under Ar to give (S)-1-phenylethanol (63% ee). Complexes t,c-3 have lifetimes of less than 10 min at 20 degrees and then isomerize to the cis-dihydride, cis-bisphosphine isomers (OC-6-32)-Ru(H)(2)(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (Delta/Lambda-c,c-3a, c,c-3b). A solution containing mainly Delta/Lambda-c,c-3a reacts with acetophenone under Ar to give (S)-1-phenylethanol in 20% ee, whereas it is an active precatalyst for its hydrogenation under 5 atm H(2) to give 1-phenylethanol with an ee of 50-60%. Complexes c,c-3 isomerize to the cis-dihydride, trans-bisphosphine complexes (OC-6-13)-Ru(H)(2)(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (c,t-3a, c,t-3b) with half-lives of 40 min and 1 h, respectively. A mixture of Delta/Lambda-c,c-3a and c,t-3a can also be obtained by reaction of 1a with KBH(Bu(sec))(3). A solution of complex c,t-3a in benzene under Ar reacts very slowly with acetophenone. These results indicate that the trans-dihydrides t,c-3a or t,c-3b along with the corresponding amido-amine complexes 2a' or 2b' are the active hydrogenation catalysts in benzene, while the cis-dihydrides c,c-3a or c,c-3b serve as precatalysts. The complexes RuCl(2)(PPh(3))(2)((R,R)-dach) or 1a, when activated by KO(t)Bu, are also sources of the active catalysts. A study of the kinetics of the hydrogenation of acetophenone in benzene catalyzed by 3a indicates a rate law: rate = k[c,c-3a](initial)[H(2)] with k = 7.5 M(-1) s(-1). The turnover-limiting step appears to be the reaction of 2a' with dihydrogen as it is for RuH(NHCMe(2)CMe(2)NH(2))(PPh(3))(2) (2c'). The catalysts are more active in 2-propanol, even without added base, and the kinetic behavior is complicated. The basic cis-dihydride c,t-3a reacts with [NEt(3)H]BPh(4) to produce the dihydrogen complex (OC-14)-[Ru(eta(2)-H(2))(H)(PPh(3))(2)((R,R)-dach)]BPh(4) (4) and with diphenylphosphinic acid to give the complex RuH(O(2)PPh(2))(PPh(3))(2)((R,R)-dach) (5). The structure of 5 models aspects of the transition state structure for the ketone hydrogenation step. Complex 2b' decomposes rapidly under Ar to give dihydrides 3b along with a dinuclear complex (PPh(3))(2)HRu(mu-eta(2);eta(4)-NHCHCHNH)RuH(PPh(3))(2) (6) containing a rare, bridging 1,4-diazabutadiene group. The formation of an imine by beta-hydride elimination from the amido-amine ligand of 2a' under Ar might explain some loss of enantioselectivity of the catalyst. The structures of complexes 1a, 5, and 6 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it