A Succession of Isomers of Ruthenium Dihydride Complexes. Which One Is the Ketone Hydrogenation Catalyst?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reaction of RuHCl(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (1a, diamine = (R,R)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane, (R,R)-dach; 1b, diamine = ethylenediamine, en) with KO(t)Bu in benzene quickly generates solutions of the amido-amine complexes RuH(PPh(3))(2)(NHC(6)H(10)NH(2)), (2a'), and RuH(PPh(3))(2)(NHCH(2)CH(2)NH(2)), (2b'), respectively. These solutions react with dihydrogen to first produce the trans-dihydrides (OC-6-22)-Ru(H)(2)(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (t,c-3a, t,c-3b). Cold solutions (-20 degrees C) containing trans-dihydride t,c-3a react with acetophenone under Ar to give (S)-1-phenylethanol (63% ee). Complexes t,c-3 have lifetimes of less than 10 min at 20 degrees and then isomerize to the cis-dihydride, cis-bisphosphine isomers (OC-6-32)-Ru(H)(2)(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (Delta/Lambda-c,c-3a, c,c-3b). A solution containing mainly Delta/Lambda-c,c-3a reacts with acetophenone under Ar to give (S)-1-phenylethanol in 20% ee, whereas it is an active precatalyst for its hydrogenation under 5 atm H(2) to give 1-phenylethanol with an ee of 50-60%. Complexes c,c-3 isomerize to the cis-dihydride, trans-bisphosphine complexes (OC-6-13)-Ru(H)(2)(PPh(3))(2)(diamine) (c,t-3a, c,t-3b) with half-lives of 40 min and 1 h, respectively. A mixture of Delta/Lambda-c,c-3a and c,t-3a can also be obtained by reaction of 1a with KBH(Bu(sec))(3). A solution of complex c,t-3a in benzene under Ar reacts very slowly with acetophenone. These results indicate that the trans-dihydrides t,c-3a or t,c-3b along with the corresponding amido-amine complexes 2a' or 2b' are the active hydrogenation catalysts in benzene, while the cis-dihydrides c,c-3a or c,c-3b serve as precatalysts. The complexes RuCl(2)(PPh(3))(2)((R,R)-dach) or 1a, when activated by KO(t)Bu, are also sources of the active catalysts. A study of the kinetics of the hydrogenation of acetophenone in benzene catalyzed by 3a indicates a rate law: rate = k[c,c-3a](initial)[H(2)] with k = 7.5 M(-1) s(-1). The turnover-limiting step appears to be the reaction of 2a' with dihydrogen as it is for RuH(NHCMe(2)CMe(2)NH(2))(PPh(3))(2) (2c'). The catalysts are more active in 2-propanol, even without added base, and the kinetic behavior is complicated. The basic cis-dihydride c,t-3a reacts with [NEt(3)H]BPh(4) to produce the dihydrogen complex (OC-14)-[Ru(eta(2)-H(2))(H)(PPh(3))(2)((R,R)-dach)]BPh(4) (4) and with diphenylphosphinic acid to give the complex RuH(O(2)PPh(2))(PPh(3))(2)((R,R)-dach) (5). The structure of 5 models aspects of the transition state structure for the ketone hydrogenation step. Complex 2b' decomposes rapidly under Ar to give dihydrides 3b along with a dinuclear complex (PPh(3))(2)HRu(mu-eta(2);eta(4)-NHCHCHNH)RuH(PPh(3))(2) (6) containing a rare, bridging 1,4-diazabutadiene group. The formation of an imine by beta-hydride elimination from the amido-amine ligand of 2a' under Ar might explain some loss of enantioselectivity of the catalyst. The structures of complexes 1a, 5, and 6 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".