MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006292453 · doi:10.1190/1.3131386

On convexity and detachment of innermost wavefront-slowness sheet

2009· article· en· W2006292453 on OpenAlexaff
Ioan Bucataru, Michael A. Slawiński

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvexitySlownessWavefrontIsotropyPositive definitenessAnisotropyElasticity (physics)Polarization (electrochemistry)MathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsClassical mechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have proved that the innermost wavefront-slowness sheet of a Hookean solid is convex, whether or not it is detached from the other sheets. This theorem is valid for the generally anisotropic case, and it is an extension of theorems whose proofs require the detachment of the innermost sheet. Although the Hookean solids that represent most materials encountered in seismology exhibit a detached innermost sheet, the positive definiteness of the elasticity tensor, which is its sole fundamental constraint, allows for the existence of both detached and nondetached sheets. Besides the foundational considerations, the omnipresence of computer methods requires that we investigate cases that, even if not commonly encountered, are within the realm of physical possibility, and can appear as the output of modeling. The theorem proved for a general Hookean solid, has been exemplified using a particular case of transverse isotropy. For that case, it has been shown that the innermost sheet exhibits a polarization of a quasicompressional wave. However, this need not be a general property of that sheet because the presented theorem refers to convexity of the innermost sheet, not to its polarization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207