Permittivity Measurements of High Conductivity Specimens using an Open-Ended Coaxial Probe—Measurement Limitations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-destructive electromagnetic wave-based techniques have been used for over a century to gain insight into the behaviour of geomaterials. The technique used in this study is a high frequency (20MHzto1.3GHz) open-ended coaxial probe measurement system. This study highlights the importance of knowing the limitations of the measurement system. The specimens that are tested are aqueous solutions of NaCl, CaCl2, and FeCl3 with conductivities ranging from approximately 10−3to8S∕m. Real permittivity data of the high conductivity specimens show a relaxation phenomena at MHz frequencies where none exists, indicating that electrode polarization is occurring. The frequency at which electrode polarization begins to manifest (e.g., limiting frequency) increases as the specimen conductivity increases. An empirical relationship between the limiting frequency and specimen conductivity is presented and is applied to three kaolinite-NaCl slurries. Additional problems associated with measuring high conductivity specimens using this equipment may arise since the model for the aperture admittance was optimized using low conductivity materials. Previous studies have shown that measurement errors at low frequencies are reduced if the system is calibrated using a material of similar electrical properties to the test specimen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it