MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006328232 · doi:10.1118/1.3182357

TU‐C‐304A‐09: Radiation Dose Reduction for Pediatric CT

2009· article· en· W2006328232 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Parinaz Massoumzadeh, Steven Don, Bruce R. Whiting

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNuclear medicineEffective dose (radiation)RadiologyRadiation doseKappaImage noisePediatric RadiologyMedical imagingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential radiation dose reduction for pediatric CT. Materials and Methods: A dose‐reduction simulation tool, which adds synthetic noise to raw projection measurements and reconstructs images at a simulated lower dose (Massoumzadeh, et al. Med. Phys. Vol. 36, pp. 174–189, 2009), was used to simulate low‐dose CT images. Simulated low‐dose CT images are created from full‐dose CT images of normal and pathological slices (lung nodules and abdominal visceral lesions). The amount of added noise was task dependent, with 10 sets of simulated low dose ranged from 1% to 85% of original dose. Sixteen pediatric cases were selected, including eight normal, three patients with pulmonary nodules, two patients with abdominal visceral organ lesions, and three patients with appendicitis without perforation. All studies performed on a 16‐row scanner, with the effects of tube current modulation and bow tie filters included. Following a short training session, 19 volunteer radiologists, from various clinical centers in the world who were attending the International Pediatric Radiology conference in Montreal in 2006, used a 5‐point scale to rate a sequence of simulated, low‐to‐high exposure images for the presence or absence of lesions. They were total of 176 images with viewing sessions limited to 45 minutes. Diagnostic agreement between full‐dose and reduced‐dose images was assessed with a weighted Kappa statistic. Result: For detection of pulmonary nodules, a decrease in the average intra‐observer agreement (kappa= 0.90) was found at 80% dose reduction, while for the detection of abdominal lesions or appendicitis a 50% reduction was observed. Conclusion: There is potential for dose reduction in CT studies, which is task dependent and greater for pulmonary nodule than for abdominal visceral lesions and appendicitis. The noise simulation methodology is a powerful tool to help understand the relationship among dose, noise, and observer agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207