Interaction between endothelial heme oxygenase-2 and endothelin-1 in altered aortic reactivity after hypoxia in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether increased expression of heme oxygenase (HO) contributes to impairment of aortic contractile responses after hypoxia through effects on reactivity to endothelin-1 (ET-1). Thoracic aortas from normoxic rats and rats exposed to hypoxia (10% O2) for 16 or 48 h were mounted in organ bath myographs for contractile studies, fixed in paraformaldehyde, or frozen in liquid nitrogen for protein extraction. In rings from normoxic rats, the HO inhibitor tin protoporphyrin IX (SnPP IX, 10 microM) did not alter the response to phenylephrine or ET-1. In rings from rats exposed to 16-h hypoxia, maximum tension generated in response to these agonists was higher in endothelium-intact but not -denuded rings in the presence of SnPP IX. In rings from rats exposed to 48-h hypoxia SnPP IX increased contraction in endothelium-intact but not -denuded rings. In endothelium-intact aortic rings from rats exposed to 16-h hypoxia incubated with endothelin A receptor-specific antagonist BQ-123 (10(-7) M), SnPP IX did not alter phenylephrine-induced contraction. Aortic ET-1 protein levels, measured by radioimmunoassay, were increased in rats exposed to hypoxia for 16 and 48 h. Western blotting showed that HO-1 and HO-2 protein were increased after 16 h of hypoxia and returned to near-control levels after 48 h. Increase in HO-1 protein was detected in endothelium-intact and -denuded rings. Removal of endothelium abolished the increase in HO-2 immunoreactivity. Immunohistochemistry localized expression of HO-1 protein to vascular smooth muscle, whereas HO-2 was only detected in endothelium. HO-2 is expressed by aortic endothelial cells early during hypoxic exposure and impairs ET-1-mediated potentiation of contraction to alpha-adrenoceptor stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".