Implication économique et intégration sociale des femmes bénéficiaires d’une caisse d’épargne et de crédit au Sénégal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cette étude est d’évaluer les effets du programme Caisse d’épargne et de crédit (CEC), à Thiès au Sénégal, sur le niveau d’implication économique et le degré d’intégration sociale des femmes bénéficiaires. Ces bénéficiaires, le groupe expérimental, sont comparées à un groupe témoin composé de femmes qui fréquentent le CPRS, mais ne bénéficient pas des services de ce programme. L’analyse des résultats montre que le programme CEC permet aux bénéficiaires d’avoir une implication économique et une intégration sociale plus forte par comparaison avec ungroupe de non-bénéficiaires. L’introduction des variables de contrôle fait ressortir que la scolarité a la même action déterminantechez les non-bénéficiaires que le programme CEC pour les bénéficiaires. On peut donc conclure que le programme est surtout efficace pour les femmes analphabètes ou peu scolarisées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".