Neue Wege für die kollektive Interessenvertretung: Einleitung DE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In dieser Ausgabe von Transfer geht es um die analytischen Kategorien, die wir verwenden, um Gewerkschaften und ihr Handeln zu verstehen. Sie fragt nach den Bedingungen für die Erneuerung der Gewerkschaften und untersucht Schlüsselkonzepte, die Denkanstöße zur Wiederbelebung der Gewerkschaften und zur Gestaltung künftiger Formen kollektiver Interessenvertretung geben sollen. In jedem Beitrag dieser Ausgabe wird ein konzeptueller Rahmen vorgeschlagen, der es dem Leser ermöglichen soll, sein eigenes Verständnis und seine Vorstellungen von kollektiver Vertretung zu überdenken. Zu den dargestellten Konzepten gehören Kategorien wie Politik, Macht, Legitimität, Demokratie, Individualismus und Kollektivismus, Gender- Framing und Frausein sowie um Klimawandel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".