MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ROLE OF FATTY ACIDS IN THE RECOVERY OF CARDIAC FUNCTION DURING RESUSCITATION FROM HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK

2001· article· en· W2006431049 on OpenAlex
Catherine B. Custalow, John A. Watts, Lisa M. Thornton, Patrick G. O’Malley, R. Wayne Barbee, Robert M. Grattan, Gary D. Lopaschuk, Jeffrey A. Kline

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueShock · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiac outputPerfusionCardiac function curveInternal medicineShock (circulatory)EndocrinologyXylazineBlood pressureFatty acidChemistryBlood volumeMedicineLactic acidHeart rateResuscitationAnesthesiaKetamineBiologyBiochemistryHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study tested the hypothesis that removal of fatty acids as a fuel source would improve cardiac efficiency at the expense of reduced cardiac contractile function in the isolated working heart after hemorrhage-retransfusion. Non-heparinized male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine and were hemorrhaged to a mean arterial blood pressure of 40 mmHg for 1 h. Two-thirds volume of shed blood was reinfused together with 0.9% NaCl in a volume equal to 2.3 times the shed blood volume, followed by continuous infusion of 0.9% NaCl at 10 mL/kg per h for 3 h. Hearts were removed and perfused in closed, recirculating working mode for 60 min to measure hydraulic work and cardiac efficiency. Rates of glycolysis and glucose oxidation were assessed with [5-3H/U-14C] glucose (11 mM) in the absence or presence of 0.4 mM palmitate. Compared to baseline measurements, hemorrhage-retransfusion significantly reduced arterial blood glucose (228+/-7 versus 118+/-12 mg/dL) and non-esterified fatty acid concentrations (0.36+/-0.01 versus 0.30+/-0.02 mM), while elevating blood lactate (0.8+/-0.1 versus 2.5+/-0.4 mM). Perfusion of sham hearts with glucose-only did not alter cardiac work compared to shams perfused with glucose plus palmitate. However, shocked hearts perfused with glucose-only demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiac work compared to shocked hearts perfused with glucose plus palmitate and compared to sham hearts perfused with glucose only (P < 0.05, repeated measures ANOVA). Shocked hearts perfused with glucose plus palmitate showed no reduction in cardiac work compared to shams. Shocked hearts perfused with glucose-only had increased glucose oxidation rates compared to shams perfused with glucose plus palmitate. In sham hearts perfused with glucose-only, myocardial glycogen and triacylglycerol contents were significantly reduced compared to hearts freeze-clamped in situ. These endogenous fuels were not decreased in shocked hearts. These data indicate that hemorrhagic shock renders the heart unable to mobilize endogenous fuels, and suggest that withdrawal of fatty acid oxidation will impair myocardial energy metabolism during resuscitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it