MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006482206 · doi:10.1080/13504850600706420

Stability of central bank preferences, macroeconomic shocks, and efficiency of the monetary policy: empirical evidence for Canada

2008· article· en· W2006482206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Economics Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsInflation (cosmology)AcknowledgementPrice of stabilityMonetary policyIndex (typography)Core (optical fiber)Monetary economicsStability (learning theory)Aggregate (composite)Core inflationPrice indexConsumer price index (South Africa)Inflation targetingMacroeconomicsEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Following the approach suggested by Favero and Rovelli (Citation2002), I estimate a three-equations system for different sub-samples for Canada. The results indicate that the preferences of the monetary authority have changed between the different regimes. In particular, the parameter associated to the implicit target of inflation has been reduced significantly. The macroeconomic conditions from the side of the aggregate demand have been more favourable than those related to the aggregate supply. The SD of the monetary rule suggests that it has been conducted successfully in the last regime. Acknowledgement Financial support from the Faculty of Social Sciences is acknowledged. Notes 1 The Equations Equation3 and Equation4 may be considered as the solutions of intertemporal optimization problems by agents of the private sector. 2 I also consider estimations using a more narrow measure of Consumer Price Index, frequently denoted as the Core CPI. Results are available upon request. 3 It is also found by Favero and Rovelli (Citation2002) for the case of the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it