Metal contacts to p-type crystalline CuInSe 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bilayers of metal contacts were deposited on p-type monocrystalline copper indium diselenide (CuInSe<sub>2</sub>) and the resistance between two contacts were measured to find low resistance metal contacts on crystalline CuInSe<sub>2</sub>. The first metal layer was Ni, Pt, Se, or Te and the second metal layer was Au, Ag, Al or Cu. It was observed that the resistance reduced when the surface of crystalline CuInSe<sub>2</sub> were etched before metal deposition with a solution containing H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>(1 %, w/w) and CrO<sub>3</sub> (1 %, w/w). It was confirmed that the resistance increases after heat-treatments at high temperature. The stability of the metal contacts in room air was estimated from the resistance measured for a period of over 20 days.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".