MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006576086 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.012412

Order of sequential magnetic phase transitions in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys as revealed by Arrott plots

2006· article· en· W2006576086 on OpenAlexaff
Xuezhi Zhou, Wei Li, H. P. Kunkel, Gwyn Williams

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicShape Memory Alloy Transformations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase transitionMaterials scienceOrder (exchange)Condensed matter physicsFerromagnetismYield (engineering)Phase (matter)PhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The slope of $H∕M$ vs ${M}^{2}$ isotherms is an accepted criterion used to distinguish first-order--discontinuous magnetic phase transitions from second-order--continuous transitions. This criterion is shown to yield the order of not only simple isolated transitions, but also sequential transitions occurring in the Ni-Mn-Ga system, specifically order-order transitions between two ferromagnetic phases, provided certain constraints are met.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicShape Memory Alloy TransformationsFrench-language works237,207