Surgical management of pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications in children with cystic fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cystic fibrosis is a common disorder, affecting as many as 1:2500 Caucasian live births. Despite improved medical management, disease-specific complications are common and are responsible for substantial morbidity and ultimately mortality. Both pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications of cystic fibrosis are well known; however, the complications requiring surgical intervention in the pediatric population are infrequent. We provide a detailed review of the cystic fibrosis-associated pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications and potential surgical options for management in children with cystic fibrosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent operative approaches are described that include application of minimally invasive surgical techniques primarily for intrathoracic disease. Novel medical therapies are also presented. Finally an attempt is made to put in perspective those surgical care advances that have had a benefit on disease outcomes. SUMMARY: This report will provide the physician caring for the child with cystic fibrosis an understanding of those disease complications that will require surgical consultation and potential operative intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".