MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surgical management of pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications in children with cystic fibrosis

2006· review· en· W2006583798 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan J. Dicken, Moritz M. Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystic fibrosisIntensive care medicineDiseaseGastrointestinal diseaseIntervention (counseling)Pediatric SurgeonPopulationSurgeryPathologyInternal medicinePediatric surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cystic fibrosis is a common disorder, affecting as many as 1:2500 Caucasian live births. Despite improved medical management, disease-specific complications are common and are responsible for substantial morbidity and ultimately mortality. Both pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications of cystic fibrosis are well known; however, the complications requiring surgical intervention in the pediatric population are infrequent. We provide a detailed review of the cystic fibrosis-associated pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications and potential surgical options for management in children with cystic fibrosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent operative approaches are described that include application of minimally invasive surgical techniques primarily for intrathoracic disease. Novel medical therapies are also presented. Finally an attempt is made to put in perspective those surgical care advances that have had a benefit on disease outcomes. SUMMARY: This report will provide the physician caring for the child with cystic fibrosis an understanding of those disease complications that will require surgical consultation and potential operative intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in PediatricsSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207