Higher Frequency of Peripheral Blood Interleukin 21 Positive Follicular Helper T Cells in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The role of follicular Th (TFH) cells remains unclear in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Our study examined the frequency of different subsets of circulating CXCR5+CD4+ T cells in patients with AS before and after receiving therapy. METHODS: Percentages of peripheral blood inducible costimulator (ICOS)+, programmed death 1 (PD-1)+, and interleukin 21 (IL-21)+ CXCR5+CD4+ T cells in 26 patients with AS and 12 healthy controls (HC) were examined by flow cytometry, and the disease activity of individual patients was measured by Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). The concentrations of serum IL-21, IgG, IgA, IgM, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were examined and the values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured. The potential association among these measures was analyzed. RESULTS: In comparison with that in HC, significantly increased percentages of CXCR5+CD4+, CXCR5+CD4+PD-1+, and CXCR5+CD4+IL-21+, but not CXCR5+CD4+ICOS+ and PD-1+ICOS+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells, and elevated concentrations of serum IL-21 were detected in patients with AS (p = 0.001, p = 0.012, p < 0.001, p = 0.233, p = 0.216, p < 0.001, respectively). Treatment with meloxicam, thalidomide, and etanercept for 1 month significantly reduced percentages of IL-21+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells and concentrations of serum IL-21 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively), accompanied by significantly minimized disease activity in drug responders, but not in the drug nonresponders. Further, percentages of IL-21+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells were positively correlated with BASDAI in patients (r = 0.6, p = 0.0012) and in the drug-responders 1 month after treatment (r = 0.68, p = 0.005), while the percentages of PD-1+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells were negatively correlated with BASDAI (r = -0.58, p = 0.0018). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that IL-21+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells may be associated with development of AS and that the frequency of IL-21+CXCR5+CD4+ T cells may be a biomarker for evaluation of disease activity and drug responses in patients with AS, particularly in drug-responding patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".