<i>De novo</i> acute hepatitis B infection in a previously vaccinated liver transplant recipient due to a strain of HBV with a Met 133 Thr mutation in the “a” determinant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: De novo HBV infection post-liver transplantation (LT) from an anti-HBc seropositive donor rarely presents as acute failure. We report a 42-year-old Caucasian female, HBsAg and anti-HBc seronegative, with primary biliary cirrhosis who received an allograft from a HBsAg negative, anti-HBc seropositive donor. The patient, previously vaccinated years pre-LT, was re-vaccinated against HBV and 1 year post-LT had an anti-HBs titre of 256 IU/l. Two years post-LT, elevated serum aminotransferases and worsening liver function with an INR of 2.0 developed. The HBsAg became positive, anti-HBs undetectable and serum HBV-DNA >2000 pg/ml by hybridisation assay. Liver biopsy revealed significant ballooning degeneration, piecemeal necrosis and positive immunostaining for HBsAg. Progressive liver failure developed followed by sepsis and terminal multi-organ failure. Subsequent analysis of the predominant HBV strain revealed mutations in the "a" determinant: Met 133 Thr (codon change ATG to ACG) and Asn 131 Thr. CONCLUSION: ' Acute de novo HBV infection from an anti-HBc sero-positive donor may occur long after LT despite protective anti-HBs titres post-vaccination secondary to the emergence of "a" determinant mutated strains of HBV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".