MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006607905 · doi:10.4000/clio.585

Un proxénète écrit à Suzy en 1941

2003· article· fr· W2006607905 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClio · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPROXHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Singulière, l’histoire d’Alban F. l’est à plus d’un titre. Au détour d’une instruction pour proxénétisme, une riche correspondance livre un matériau hors du commun. Un proxénète parle de lui, de son commerce, de la manière de le conduire. Confrontées à l’ensemble de la procédure judiciaire, ces quelques lettres permettent de camper une relation hors-norme, pour laquelle l’historien ne dispose bien souvent que de maigres sources, livrant une évocation tronquée d’une relation essentielle de la chaîne prostitutionnelle. En même temps qu’elles présentent un homme tantôt affable, tantôt menaçant, elles détaillent la trajectoire individuelle d’un homme dont l’« entreprise » est désorganisée par le contexte de l’Occupation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it