MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006608952 · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.004

Cost-Utility of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Chronic and Controlled Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A 3-Year Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial and Economic Evaluation

2011· article· en· W2006608952 on OpenAlexafffund
Ron Goeree, Rob Hopkins, John K. Marshall, David Armstrong, Wendy J. Ungar, Charles H. Goldsmith, Christopher Allen, Mehran Anvari

Bibliographic record

VenueValue in Health · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonPrograms for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineGERDRandomized controlled trialCost–utility analysisHeartburnQuality of life (healthcare)Nissen fundoplicationQuality-adjusted life yearPhysical therapyCost effectivenessRefluxEconomic evaluationInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueValue in HealthSame topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207