MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discharge Planning Utilizing the Discharge Train

2008· article· en· W2006617583 on OpenAlexaffabout
Barbara J. Gaal, Susan Blatz, Joanne Dix, Barb Jennings

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Neonatal Care · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDischarge planningMultidisciplinary approachConfusionMedicinePatient dischargeIntensive careMultidisciplinary teamHealth careHospital dischargeIdentification (biology)NursingMedical emergencyProcess (computing)MEDLINEIntensive care medicinePsychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Ontario, publicly funded, regionalized healthcare enables transfer of convalescing infants from level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to regional level II nurseries prior to discharge home. To facilitate a timely transfer and allow time for preparation of families and regional hospital nurseries, NICU staff must recognize infant readiness early. This article describes the implementation process of a 4-part, multidisciplinary, discharge planning instrument that assists staff in early identification of infant readiness for transfer or discharge home. Titled the Discharge Planning Train, this interactive instrument encourages communication and collaboration between all levels of the multidisciplinary staff and with families and decreases confusion at the time of transfer. Barriers to and strategies for successful implementation are included. Evaluation methods and results are presented. The success of the instrument in improving communication and collaboration with the families is well described by the RNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Neonatal CareSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207