Characterization of a Novel Rat Epididymal Cell Line to Study Epididymal Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The epididymis is an androgen-dependent organ that allows spermatozoa to become fully functional as they pass through this tissue. The specialized functions of the epididymis are mediated by interactions between epididymal epithelial cells and between epididymal cells and spermatozoa. Although the critical role of the epididymis in sperm maturation is well established, the mechanisms regulating cell-cell interactions remain poorly understood because of the lack of appropriate cell line models. We now report the characterization of a novel rat caput epididymal cell line (RCE) that was immortalized by transfecting primary cultures of rat epididymal cells with the simian virus 40 large T antigen. At the electron microscope level, the cell line was composed of epithelial principal cells with characteristics of in vivo cells; principal cells had well-developed Golgi apparatus, abundant endoplasmic reticulum cisternae, and few endosomes. RCE cells expressed the mRNAs coding for the androgen receptor, estrogen receptor alpha, and 4-ene-steroid-5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 as well as epididymal-specific markers Crisp-1 and epididymal retinoic acid binding protein. Epididymal retinoic acid binding protein expression was significantly induced with dihydrotestosterone, although this effect was not blocked by flutamide, suggesting that RCE cells are not androgen responsive. Neighboring cells formed tight and gap junctions characteristic of epididymal cells in vivo and expressed tight (occludin and claudin-1, -3, and -4) and gap junctional proteins (connexin-26, -30.3, -32, and -43). The RCE cell line displays many characteristics of epithelial principal cells, thus providing a model for studying epididymal cell functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".