MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006661506 · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2013.2292549

Monolithic Wafer-Level Rectangular Waveguide and Its Transition to Coplanar Waveguide Line Using a Simplified 3-D Fabrication Process

2014· article· en· W2006661506 on OpenAlexaff
Nahid Vahabisani, Mojgan Daneshmand

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoplanar waveguideWaveguideFabricationWaferMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsCapacitive sensingInsertion lossCoupling (piping)Microelectromechanical systemsCapacitive couplingLine (geometry)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsMicrowaveEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we are introducing a new category of wafer-level micromachined rectangular waveguide devices and illustrate a new transition of these devices to Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) lines for millimeter-wave applications. The 3-D fabrication process used in this paper utilizes a combination of thin film and thick film processes and produces a simple three-mask fabrication process. As a result, all the on-wafer elements such as the waveguide, the CPW lines, and their transition are simultaneously fabricated, which eliminates the ever-existing requirement of hybrid assembly of the waveguide parts. A metalized post is employed to couple the signal from the CPW line to the waveguide. Unlike the previous designs that are mostly based on capacitive coupling, the proposed CPW to waveguide transition is based on inductive coupling, which simplifies the fabrication requirements and improves the performance. Here, the entire back-to-back structure is designed, fabricated, and measured on a 10 mm2wafer area. A wide-band RF performance is measured for the proposed waveguide structure. Our measured results show an insertion loss of as low as 1 dB at 72 GHz range. The proposed technique to realize wafer-level waveguides has great potential to include a variety of waveguide topologies including bends and arcs. Besides, this method allows for further expansion of the topic to integrate MEMS components inside the waveguide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing TechnologySame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207