Monolithic Wafer-Level Rectangular Waveguide and Its Transition to Coplanar Waveguide Line Using a Simplified 3-D Fabrication Process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we are introducing a new category of wafer-level micromachined rectangular waveguide devices and illustrate a new transition of these devices to Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) lines for millimeter-wave applications. The 3-D fabrication process used in this paper utilizes a combination of thin film and thick film processes and produces a simple three-mask fabrication process. As a result, all the on-wafer elements such as the waveguide, the CPW lines, and their transition are simultaneously fabricated, which eliminates the ever-existing requirement of hybrid assembly of the waveguide parts. A metalized post is employed to couple the signal from the CPW line to the waveguide. Unlike the previous designs that are mostly based on capacitive coupling, the proposed CPW to waveguide transition is based on inductive coupling, which simplifies the fabrication requirements and improves the performance. Here, the entire back-to-back structure is designed, fabricated, and measured on a 10 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> wafer area. A wide-band RF performance is measured for the proposed waveguide structure. Our measured results show an insertion loss of as low as 1 dB at 72 GHz range. The proposed technique to realize wafer-level waveguides has great potential to include a variety of waveguide topologies including bends and arcs. Besides, this method allows for further expansion of the topic to integrate MEMS components inside the waveguide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it